-
The indication is that the major diseases of hot
peppers in the Caribbean are those caused by Phytophtora spp.,
Sclerotium spp. and Rhizoctonia spp. Although these
fungal pests have been recorded in the Caribbean, the degree of infestation
seems to be mild. Refer to CARDI
(1982).
-
The control measures needed to control these incidences
of mild infection are available.
-
The most important disease of hot pepper is the
seed borne Pepper Mosaic Virus. Management includes a high level of
field sanitation, selective intercropping and rotation and the judicious
use of pesticides. Although the insect pest complex of hot peppers
includes a great variety of insects and mites, most are of minor importance
as they occur seasonally. Refer to Jones
(1988).
-
The major insect pest is the pepper flower bud
moth. Although mentioned in the TIF, there is no guide available for
its management.
-
A follow-up is needed on the Jones
(1988) report of the treat posed by the wet season
mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus in Trinidad and Tobago.
-
The pesticide residue data compiled by Montalvo-Zapata
et al (1988) in Puerto Rico for non-bell peppers should
provide a guide for the Caribbean Basin. For herbicides (fluazifop-butyl);
Nematicides (fenamiphos and oxamyl); Insecticides (permethrin and
acephate) and Fungicides (benomyl).
-
In Technical Bulletin No. 18 Characteristics and Control
of Viruses Infecting Peppers: A Literature Review by Green
and Kim (1991) and published by the Asian Vegetable Research
and Development Centre, some 35 viruses were reported as infecting peppers
(Capsicum spp.). Of these, more than half are transmitted by aphids.
The other viruses are transmitted by nematodes, thrips, leafhoppers, whiteflies,
beetles and fungi. Several are transmitted by contact and/or through the
soil by mechanisms not yet understood. Most pepper viruses are distributed
worldwide with the exception of chili veinal mottle virus, pepper severe
mosaic virus, pepper veinal mottle virus, pepper mild mosaic virus and
pepper mottle virus. These have been reported only in certain geographic
areas. Virus?infected peppers generally exhibit a variety of symptoms,
the most common of which are mosaic, mottle, necrosis and leaf distortion.
Many of these viruses cause considerable yield losses. Various methods
of control, aimed primarily at the vectors of the viruses, and are reported
in the Review.
Some of the symptoms of pepper viruses and virus-like
symptoms presented by Green and Kim (1991) are shown below.
McDonald
(1999) states that the major constraints to sustained growth
and development in hot pepper production in the Caribbean are pests and
diseases and soil and water management. In Jamaica the 'Scotch Bonnet'
cv. is plagued with two major viral diseases:
- Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV)
- Potato Virus Y (PVY)
The aphid vectors (Aphis gossypii, Myzus persicae)
are known to be pests by themselves. Other arthropod pests of hot pepper
in Jamaica and the rest of the Caribbean itself have been reported:
| Gall midge complex |
Contarinia lycopersici/Prodiplosis
longifila |
| Banded cucumber beetle |
Diabrotica balteata |
| Tobacco whitefly |
Bemisia tabaci (B-type and non B-type) |
| Broad mite |
Polyphagotarsonemus latus |
| Mealy bugs |
Pseudococcus spp, Maconellicoccus
hirsutus |
The economic important disease complex on hot pepper
'W.I. Red' cv. is the White Fly/Gemini virus complex in the Eastern Caribbean
and Trinidad. Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) alone can incur economic
damage on plant growth and vigour.
Pictures taken by Jim Davis on his trip to Jamaica are
presented below showing insect and viral damage to hot pepper at Brampton
Farm:
In recent work carried out in Barbados, in validating
a production system for hot pepper, the following was reported:
A system of windbreaks was planted to keep out whiteflies.
Coupled with this, sticky traps and an insecticide were used. Bright
yellow plastic containers painted with grease on the inside, were placed
at ground level. A number of straps (500) were distributed over the
0.91 ha plot at equal distances. The 3-week old seedlings were drenched
with a systemic insecticide, Admire 2F®, a.i. imidacloprid, at a
rate of 2.4 l/ha (2 pints/ac). The pH of the solution was adjusted to
4.5 before mixing the Admire 2F®. The main target insects were whitefly
and aphid. Immediately, after transplanting Diazinon®, (an organophosphate),
was sprayed against whitefly and other insects. The rate of application
was 1.4 l/ha (1 pint/ac). This contact insecticide was sprayed another
time on 8th July 1998 targeting a Heliothis sp. which drilled
holes in the berries within which the larvae fed. Sherpa®, a.i.
cypermethrin, was also sprayed on 16th April 1998 against the same insect,
at a rate of 165 ml/ha (75 ml/ac in 30 gallons of water). In July, fungi
and bacterial rots on berries and leaves were combated by two sprays
8 July 1998 and 23 July 1998, of Safer Insecticidal Soap® at 11
l/ha (1 gallon/ac) mixed with Spraytech Oil® at 1.4 l/ha (1 pint/ac).
|